C. pulcher Wiedemann 1830. It is likely that, as presently recognised, it is comprised of more than just one species. Possible synonyms:C. linearis Kieffer Freeman (1957) listed a number of species as synonyms: C. tripunctatus Kieffer 1908, C. nairobi 1913, C. sensualis Kieffer 1914, C. schwetzi Goetghebuer 1936, with additional information from Dejoux, 1968). Adult: (based on description of Indian specimens by Chaudhuri et al. 1992, with additional information from Dejoux, 1968). ![]() From Chaudhuri et al. (1992) Head: Yellowish brown, antennae and palps brown; frontal tubercles present; clypeus with 18-20 setae Ratio of maxillary palp segments: 8 : 12: 42 : 40 : 60 - P5/P4 1.5; P5/P3 1.43. Thorax: Greenish yellow, mesoscutum with 3 dark yellow vittae. Setae: Acrostichals 16, dorsocentrals 14-15, humerals 2, prealars 4, scutellar 12. Legs: Yellowish green, tarsal segments slightly darker at apices. Fore tibia with blunt scale (see b above) with 2 long setae. Abdomen: Tergites greenish yellow with slightly darker markings on the middorsal line. Hypopygium as illustrated above, anal point narrow, slightly expanded subapically; Superior volsella of D-type of Strenzke 1959; Inferior volsella extends beyond anal point to about middle of the gonostylus, which narrows gently over posterior half (although Dejoux, 1968 shows one side narrowing gently but the other quite abruptly.Female: not known. Pupa: (from Dejoux 1968)): length about 9-10 mm. Spur about 250 µm long, with 1-2 spines. ![]() C. pulcher pupa and larval mouthparts. ![]() C. pulcher larva. From Chaudhuri et al. (1992) Fourth instar larva: a plumosus-type. No other information on larvae from India or the oriental region known, so information from African specimens: Cytology: Wülker et al. (2011) have given a description of the banding sequences of specimens tentatively described as C. pulcher from Kenya in Africa. ![]() Possible karyotype of C. pulcher from Wülker et al. 2011 South Africa - "Cape" (Type locality). Kenya - nr. River Athi, s. Nairobi (Wülker et al. 2011). Morphology described by Chaudhuri et al. 1992. Possible cytology by Wülker et al. (2011). However, it is likely that there is more than one species currently included under this name. |